Photo caption from page 2 of today's LA Times:
"A day after a picture of Saddam Hussein in his underwear was published, police in Baghdad read about more photos. The Red Cross said Hussein's right to privacy was violated."
I'm not sure what's more disturbing.
1. The selection of this as a news-worthy tidbit; or
2. The inevitable conclusion that this is probably pretty representative of media coverage a la 2005.